MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237559227 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316459812.001

State Food Crimes

2016· book-chapter· en· W4237559227 on OpenAlexaff
Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamineState (computer science)PoliticsPolitical scienceIndictmentStarvationDevelopment economicsRight to foodNeglectFood securityDutyPolitical economyLawGeographySociologyEconomicsAgricultureMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book discusses state food crimes; that is, crimes by states that deny their own citizens and others for whom they are directly responsible one of their most fundamental human rights, the right to food. The worst type of deprivation of food is famine. Not only are famines not pure natural disasters, they are often consequences of national policy decisions that benefit political elites at the expense of the populations whose well-being is entrusted to them. As de Waal argues, “The occurrence of famine is an indictment of the ethics of the country in which it has occurred” (de Waal 1991, 77). Through the use of four late twentieth and early twenty-first century case studies described in Part II, this book demonstrates that some states – or political elites in those states – deliberately deprive their citizens of food while others neglect to ensure that their citizens, or others for whom they are responsible, have adequate nutrition. The four cases are North Korea in the 1990s and twenty-first century; Zimbabwe since 2000; Venezuela since 1999; and the West Bank and Gaza (WBG) in the 1990s and twenty-first century. The factual descriptions of food policies in these countries end as of April 2015. I draw these four cases from different areas of the world and different political systems. North Korea, an Asian country, was a pseudo-Communist dynastic regime. Zimbabwe in the 2000s became an authoritarian regime ruled by a small clique of family and allies surrounding President Robert Mugabe. Venezuela was ruled from 1999 to 2013 by an increasingly authoritarian populist, Hugo Chávez, succeeded by Nicolás Maduro, who intensified Chávez's policies. Israel, internally a democracy, was an occupying power in the West Bank and exercised effective control over Gaza. Many countries in which famine exists are at war. I have deliberately chosen three cases – North Korea, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela – in which war is not a complicating variable. In the case of WBG, the Gaza War of 2009 is one reason why Palestinians suffered malnutrition, but the main reason for malnutrition in the West Bank was colonialism. I have also chosen states with functioning (however corrupt or malevolent) governments, rather than failed states: thus, for example, I have chosen Zimbabwe over Somalia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicWildlife Conservation and Criminology AnalysesFrench-language works237,207