MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237560711 · doi:10.24036/student.v3i6.498

[no title]

2019· article· W4237560711 on OpenAlexaff
Sonia Sonia, Helfia Edial

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL BUANA · 2019
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research was conducted in Pagai island, Mentawai Island regency, which was aims to find out: 1) Index of threat earthquake disaster, 2) Index of population that exposed the earthquake disaster, 3) The threat level of earthquake disaster in Pagai Island. The method used in this research was descriptive with a quantitative approach and the data used was secondary data obtained from relevant agencies. The results showed that the threat index of earthquake disaster which was affected by the distribution of PGA with a range of values ​​between 0.342 - 1.477 gal. The classification of earthquake hazard index in this study is in two classes, that is index class of high threat of peak ground acceleration with a range of values ​​between 0.706 - 1.477 gal found in South Pagai District, Sikakap District and North Pagai District. While the medium threat index class with a range between 0.342 - 0.705 gal found in North Pagai District and Sikakap District. The index of population that exposed in Pagai Island obtained an index value of 0.6 which indicates the medium class category.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL BUANASame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207