MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4237610057 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13434

Detecting Geomagnetically Induced Currents in Electric Power Transmission Lines

2019· dissertation· en· W4237610057 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Lackey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomagnetically induced currentElectric power transmissionSmart gridElectric power systemGridEngineeringSystems engineeringPower gridElectrical engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)GeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern electric power transmission systems are becoming increasingly complex due to smart grid development and the need for climate change adaptation, rendering transmission systems more vulnerable to impacts via GIC.A current challenge in the field of GIC detection and measurement is the focus on simulation tools and techniques not advancing towards real-world implementation due to the complexities of GIC events.This thesis addresses this engineering challenge through design and implementation of a GIC test bench and demonstration of a new approach for simple GIC detection and measurement.Furthermore, the work establishes capabilities of a robust GIC measurement platform designed and implemented to enable straightforward use and integration with modern grid infrastructure.This thesis has resulted in systems that bridge the gaps between simulation tools and real-world deployments of GIC detection and measurement systems, providing a solid foundation for further research and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→