MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237624345 · doi:10.1002/jgt.10121

Partitioning a graph into two isomorphic pieces

2003· article· en· W4237624345 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Bonato, Richard J. Nowakowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graph Theory · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsInduced subgraphCographProperty (philosophy)Discrete mathematicsGraphSplit graphLine graphPathwidth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A simple graph G has the neighbour‐closed‐co‐neighbour property, or ncc property, if for all vertices x of G , the subgraph induced by the set of neighbours of x is isomorphic to the subgraph induced by the set of non‐neighbours of x . We present characterizations of graphs with the ncc property via the existence of certain perfect matchings, and thereby prove that the ncc graphs can be recognized in polynomial time. Operations preserving the ncc property are discussed, and the graphs with the ncc property that are r ‐regular, where r ≤ 5, are classified. The graphs with the ncc property that are locally H , for certain graphs H are classified. Infinite graphs with the ncc property are discussed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 44: 1–14, 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Graph TheorySame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207