MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237677516 · doi:10.2523/78170-ms

Quantifying Rock Capillary Strength Behavior in Unconsolidated Sandstones

2002· article· en· W4237677516 on OpenAlexaff
Guixin Han, M.B. Dusseault, J. Cook

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapillary actionWettingSaturation (graph theory)Contact angleSurface tensionParticle sizeCapillary numberMaterials scienceSPHERESCapillary pressureComposite materialCapillary lengthParticle (ecology)Geotechnical engineeringMechanicsChemistryGeologyThermodynamicsPhysicsPorous medium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in water saturation or rock wettability can lead to rock instability and sand production. The effects of saturation on rock strength have two origins - chemical sensitivity and changes in capillary forces. In this paper, a detailed study of capillary rock strength behavior after water breakthrough is carried out for four different models. These four models account for particle-particle interactions and include spherical particles in tangential contact, differently sized spheres in tangential contact, squeezed contacts, and detached spheres. The effects of fluid properties (e.g. contact angle and surface tension), rock properties (e.g. particle size, size ratio, contact fabric), and deformation of loaded rock on capillary strength have been mathematically expressed and quantified.The model calculations indicate: For all the models, capillary strength increases linearly with increasing surface tension between fluid phases.Contact angle influences both the magnitude of capillary strength and its variation with saturation. The larger the contact angle, the lower the magnitude (under the same water saturation) and the faster its decrease with increasing saturation.If the particle size is uniform, small particle size results in high capillary strength. If particles have different sizes, the size ratio of the particles has a similar influence on capillary strength as does fluid contact angle: it affects both the magnitude of capillary strength and its variation with water saturation. However, the relationships are different: the smaller the size difference, the higher the magnitude and the slower its decrease with saturation.For the detached and squeezed models the capillary force (or strength) firstly increases with water saturation, then decreases after a critical saturation, in contrast to the tangential contact model where capillary force always decreases with water saturation.Through the introduction of the strain concept into the capillary models, they can be used to describe capillary strength variations with rock deformation. It is found that capillary strength more-or-less reaches a maximum when spheres are tangentially contacted, and decreases in both the squeezed and detached states, but decreasing much faster with increasing deformation in the squeezed state.These improvements in the micromechanical modeling of sands will be used to build our understanding of sand production in very weak or unconsolidated rocks, clarifying how sand production is affected by changes in saturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207