Field Testing of a New Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging-While-Drilling Tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Field Testing of a New Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging-While-Drilling Tool Jan Morley; Jan Morley Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Ralf Heidler; Ralf Heidler Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jack Horkowitz; Jack Horkowitz Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Bruno Luong; Bruno Luong Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Charles Woodburn; Charles Woodburn Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Martin Poitzsch; Martin Poitzsch Schlumberger Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Tim Borbas; Tim Borbas Conoco, Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Brett Wendt Brett Wendt Conoco, Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, September 2002. Paper Number: SPE-77477-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/77477-MS Published: September 29 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Morley, Jan, Heidler, Ralf, Horkowitz, Jack, Luong, Bruno, Woodburn, Charles, Poitzsch, Martin, Borbas, Tim, and Brett Wendt. "Field Testing of a New Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging-While-Drilling Tool." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, September 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/77477-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractDownhole nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements are evolving into a powerful formation evaluation tool, providing unique and critical information including formation porosity, pore-size distributions, bound-fluid volume (BFV), free-fluid volume (FFV), permeability, and fluid properties. Obtaining this information while drilling can have a significant impact on drilling and completion decisions. In addition, low rates of penetration common in many drilling environments can be advantageous in improving the NMR measurement statistics.This paper describes results gained during field tests of a new NMR logging-while-drilling (LWD) tool that has been designed to run in any standard measurement-while-drilling (MWD) bottomhole assembly. The new tool presents no special operational complications in terms of mechanical specifications or wellsite hardware and software, and it has been tested successfully in both real-time and recorded modes in a wide range of formations and drilling conditions. A key consideration in the design of this tool has been to deliver an NMR measurement of wireline quality with a minimum of interference to the drilling process. To this end, the tool is usable in various modes of operation (stabilized, unstabilized, while drilling, while reaming, etc.).The detrimental effects of tool motion on the NMR measurement are minimized through the hardware design. Motion-effects modeling and log examples address these issues. Having the capability of acquiring data in the conventional T2 mode, this tool offers a familiar interpretation strategy for those users accustomed to evaluating wireline NMR data along with a significant advantage in statistical precision over a T1 acquisition mode.IntroductionMany oil exploration and production companies have been awaiting NMR technology capability in the LWD environment. With the inclusion of an LWD NMR tool in the bottomhole assembly (BHA) transmitting in real time, well-placement decisions that impact the overall economics and productivity of a well can be readily addressed. In highly deviated wells or in difficult logging conditions, an LWD NMR tool is the obvious replacement for wireline NMR data acquisition. Therefore, it is extremely important to design an LWD NMR tool that can produce industry-accepted NMR measurements and that can be added to the BHA with a minimum of additional time, cost, and disruption to the normal drilling process. Desirable features include precise and repeatable measurements, operation at high rates of penetration (ROP), measurements familiar to and accepted by the industry (similar to those made by wireline tools), high vertical resolution, flexibility of placement in the BHA, and real-time calculation and transmission of petrophysical and tool-motion information in the while-drilling, bit-on-bottom environment to reduce the need for additional passes after drilling.In the past few years, the LWD NMR tool described in this paper has been run in a large number of offshore wells on the shelf and in the deepwater of the Gulf of Mexico, offshore eastern Canada, the North Sea and Nigeria, and in a number of onshore wells in North America. During these field tests, two generations of the tool were run. The first-generation tool was powered only by batteries and a significant improvement came with the second-generation tool that was designed to address the large power consumption of T2-mode acquisition with the inclusion of a dedicated mud turbine. In conjunction with increasing on-board memory, the mud turbine power supply provided the second-generation tool with essentially unlimited downhole run time, which is a key benefit to any LWD tool when dealing with the highly variable nature of the overall drilling process and unscheduled rig operations. In a number of field tests with the battery-powered tools, data acquisition over target objectives could not be accomplished because the tool ran out of power before the objectives had been reached. Keywords: sensitivity curve, bfv, lwd tool, standard deviation, drilling, lwd nmr tool, noise, nmr measurement, acquisition mode, porosity Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Open hole/cased hole log analysis This content is only available via PDF. 2002. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".