MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 2388: In vitro assessment of tumor associated I.O. markers in cancer cell lines following Vicinium treatment

2019· article· en· W4237698074 on OpenAlexaff
Shilpa Chooniedass, Rachelle L. Dillon, Arjune Premsukh, Glen C. MacDonald, Jeannick Cizeau, Gregory P. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsResearch Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vitroCancerBiologyCancer researchOncologyPathologyInternal medicineMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vicinium is a fusion protein that comprises a scFv fragment specific for the Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) genetically fused to a truncated form of Pseudomonas exotoxin A, ETA, via a flexible linker. Vicinium is used for the treatment of loco-regionally accessible tumors and is currently in a phase III clinical trial (VISTA) for the treatment of high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and a phase I study in combination with durvalumab for the same indication. In a different phase I study in late stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, direct injection of Vicinium led to shrinkage of the principal injected tumor as well as non-targeted tumors in some patients suggesting the activation of a T cell-mediated anti-tumor response through cross-priming. Supporting this hypothesis, in vitro studies have demonstrated that Vicinium mediated tumor cell killing elicits biological features of an immunogenic cell death (ICD). Tumor cells’ ability to evade the innate and adaptive immune response plays a major role in cancer development and progression. Altered expression of immune modulators is a key mechanism responsible for tumor escape. Recent studies have shown that exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs results in the selection of tumor cells expressing immunosuppressive markers such as PD-L1, CD47 and CD39. Following in vitro treatment with Vicinium, the enrichment of tumor cell population expressing I.O. markers was examined and compared to chemotherapeutic agents. Unlike small molecule chemotherapies, Vicinium treatment did not lead to an enrichment of CD47 or CD39 positive tumor cell populations. Taken together, the data suggests that Vicinium does not induce an immunosuppressive environment.Citation Format: Shilpa Chooniedass, Rachelle L. Dillon, Arjune Premsukh, Glen C. MacDonald, Jeannick Cizeau, Gregory P. Adams. In vitro assessment of tumor associated I.O. markers in cancer cell lines following Vicinium treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2388.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunologySame topicMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207