MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237699038 · doi:10.1177/0014524608099798

Irenaeus

2008· article· en· W4237699038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Denis Minns

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Expository Times · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGospelPhilosophyDoctrineTheologyQuarter (Canadian coin)ClassicsHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irenaeus was a leader of the Christian community at Lyons in the last quarter of the second century. Motivated by a deep pastoral concern, he set himself to refute what he considered to be distortions of the authentic Gospel, and, in the process, he became one of the earliest Christian writers to attempt a synthesis of the major themes of theology. Largely forgotten during much of the subsequent theological tradition, he has come to be seen as a crucial figure in the early history of the development of Christian doctrine, and has much to say that modern readers will find fresh and stimulating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Expository TimesSame topicTheology and Canon Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207