Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Post Induction of Anesthesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the case of a 67-year-old female patient who underwent radiofrequency ablation of a renal cell carcinoma, and developed dynamic ST elevation immediately following induction of anesthesia. She was transferred to the cardiac catheterization laboratory where she underwent a coronary angiogram. This showed no obstruction of the coronary arteries, but an echocardiogram demonstrated an ejection fraction of 20% with a picture suggestive of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. The patient later developed pulmonary edema requiring continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPAP), inotropes and vasopressors. She made a good recovery by the third day following induction, with resolution of her elevated ST segments, troponin and impaired ejection fraction. J Med Cases. 2015;6(9):437-439 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2280w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".