MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CD3 deficiencies

2005· review· en· W4237741373 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Fischer, Geneviève de Saint Basile, Françoise Le Deist

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunodeficiencyPhenotypeSevere combined immunodeficiencyCD3GeneMutationPrimary immunodeficiencyImmunologyLymphocyteT-cell receptorT cellMedicineGeneticsBiologyAntigenImmune systemCD8

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The molecular characterization of inherited T-cell immunodeficiencies has contributed to delineating key factors in human T-cell development. This review reports on the recent description of deleterious mutations in the genes encoding CD3 subunits expressed at the T-lymphocyte membrane in association with the T-cell receptor. RECENT FINDINGS: Homozygous mutations in CD3D and CD3E genes lead to a complete block in T-cell development and thus to an early-onset severe combined immunodeficiency phenotype. Thymic studies have shown that the defect in T-cell development occurs at the transition between 'double-negative' and 'double-positive' thymocytes. These results contrast with the partial T-cell immunodeficiency caused by a deficiency in CD3G. SUMMARY: Two new severe combined immunodeficiency conditions have been reported as a consequence of either CD3D or CD3E deficiency. The distinct phenotype of CD3G deficiency sheds light on the differential roles of CD3 subunits in T-lymphocyte development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical ImmunologySame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207