MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237753727 · doi:10.1145/2502880

Proceedings of the 2013 ACM MobiCom workshop on Lowest cost denominator networking for universal access

2013· paratext· en· W4237753727 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetInternet accessComputer scienceScalabilityDigital divideUniversal designTelecommunicationsInternet privacyComputer securityWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the 2013 ACM MobiCom Workshop on Lowest Cost Denominator Networking -- LCDNet 2013. Internet has crossed new frontiers with access getting faster and cheaper. The Internet Society's recent global Internet survey reveals that the Internet should be considered as a basic human birthright. On one end, we have the developed world where access is getting faster and services being developed to utilize faster access. On the other end, there are people who do not have access to the Internet at all. Some may not be able to get it due to lack of infrastructure support (which accounts to the notion of digital divide problem faced by most people in developed countries). There have been significant initiatives to solve the problem of affordable infrastructure. Crucially, most of these approaches address infrastructural barriers without addressing economic ones. Leaving connectivity for all to be governed by market economics is a major impediment to achieving the full benefits of the Internet, and that basic Internet access should be made freely available to all due to its societal benefits. The current Internet access model governed by market economics makes it practically infeasible for enabling universal access especially for those with socio-economic barriers. There are both research and policy challenges to the realization of a future Internet capability that will offer appropriate access to all parts of society. The goal of the ACM LCDNet 2013 workshop is to address a range of research challenges (feasibility, scalability, security, new privacy challenges, robustness, resource allocation, sustainability, performance etc.) that are needed to overcome to enable universal Internet access. The call for papers attracted several submissions on a wide range of networking topics. The papers were peer reviewed by a minimum of three reviewers and were extremely selective. The program committee finally accepted 9 papers (including posters). We hope that these proceedings will serve as a valuable reference for both academic and industry researchers. We also encourage attendees to attend the keynote presentations. These valuable and insightful talks can and will guide us to a better understanding of the challenges in enabling Universal Internet access: The Challenge of Deployment, Prof Srinivasan Keshav (University of Waterloo, Canada)Nanosatellites for Universal Network Access, Scott Burleigh (JPL, NASA)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0080.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207