Identité sexuée et pouvoir : Genre et classe sociale, sexualité, citoyenneté, nation et colonialisme. Kathleen M. Brown, Good Wives, Nasty Wenches, and Anxious Patriarchs : Gender, Race and Power in Colonial Virginia (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1996) ; Catherine Hall, Civilising Subjects : Metropole and Colony in the British Imagination, 1830-1867 (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2002) ; Adele Perry, On the Edge of Empire : Gender, Race and the Making of British Columbia, 1849-1871 (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2001) ; Mary Louise Roberts, Disruptive Acts : The New Woman in Fin-de-Siècle France (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002) ; Bonnie G. Smith, The Gender of History : Men, Women and Historical Practice (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1998) ; Angela Woolacott, To Try Her Fortune in London : Australian Women, Colonialism and Modernity (New York, Oxford University Press, 2001).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identité sexuée et pouvoir : genre et classe sociale, sexualité, citoyenneté, nation et colonialisme / Kathleen M. Brown, Good Wives, Nasty Wenches, and Anxious Patriarchs : Gender, Race and Power in Colonial Virginia (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 1996) ; / Catherine Hall, Civilising Subjects : Metropole and Colony in the British Imagination, 1830-1867 (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2002) ; / Adele Perry, On the Edge of Empire : Gender, Race and the Making of British Columbia, 1849-1871 (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2001) ; / Mary Louise Roberts, Disruptive Acts : The New Woman in Fin-de-Siècle France (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002) ; / Bonnie G. Smith, The Gender of History : Men, Women and Historical Practice (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1998) ; / Angela Woolacott, To Try Her Fortune in London : Australian Women, Colonialism and Modernity (New York, Oxford University Press, 2001).. Un article de la revue Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française (« Féminin/masculin : l’histoire du genre ») diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".