Treatment Outcome in Endodontics: The Toronto Study. Phase 1: Initial Treatment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed the 4- to 6-yr outcome of initial endodontic treatment during Phase 1 of the “Toronto Study” project. A total of 450 teeth were treated, alternating the “Schilder” technique and step-back with lateral condensation, and examined clinically and radiographically by an independent examiner. Apical periodontitis was recorded as absent (periapical index < 3) or present (periapical index ≥ 3) and outcome dichotomized as “healed” (no apical periodontitis, no signs or symptoms) or “disease.” Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed (p = 0.05) on 120 examined teeth. The “healed” rate (81% overall) was significantly higher for teeth treated without apical periodontitis (92%) than with apical periodontitis (74%). Several other factors were associated with healing rate differential of 10% or higher, but no statistical significance. This study confirmed apical periodontitis as the main prognostic factor in initial endodontic treatment. Continuation of the project will allow assessment of other prognostic factors with better power. This study assessed the 4- to 6-yr outcome of initial endodontic treatment during Phase 1 of the “Toronto Study” project. A total of 450 teeth were treated, alternating the “Schilder” technique and step-back with lateral condensation, and examined clinically and radiographically by an independent examiner. Apical periodontitis was recorded as absent (periapical index < 3) or present (periapical index ≥ 3) and outcome dichotomized as “healed” (no apical periodontitis, no signs or symptoms) or “disease.” Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed (p = 0.05) on 120 examined teeth. The “healed” rate (81% overall) was significantly higher for teeth treated without apical periodontitis (92%) than with apical periodontitis (74%). Several other factors were associated with healing rate differential of 10% or higher, but no statistical significance. This study confirmed apical periodontitis as the main prognostic factor in initial endodontic treatment. Continuation of the project will allow assessment of other prognostic factors with better power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it