MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237815235 · doi:10.5325/weslmethstud.8.1.0073

Review

2015· article· en· W4237815235 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gareth J. Powell

Bibliographic record

VenueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyCLARITYContext (archaeology)Argument (complex analysis)EnthusiasmPneumatologyTheologySubject (documents)EpistemologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With considerable clarity Joseph Cunningham, who teaches philosophy at Saginaw Valley State University, sets about describing and assessing Wesley's concern with the development and articulation of a theology of the Spirit. This he does with a combination of historical, theological, and philosophical insight, paying close attention, albeit with a refreshingly light touch, to the context in which Wesley fashioned his theological understandings. This is no mean feat given that, as Cunningham reminds us, Wesley's pneumatological nomenclature was variegated (vii). The core of Cunningham's argument is that Wesley was anxious to set out with some clarity the relationship between the Holy Spirit, religious knowledge, and the nature of spiritual being. An obvious starting point for this is Wesley's correspondence (1745–8) with John Smith (a pseudonymous figure). Here Wesley was concerned with defending his view that it is possible for men and women to encounter or sense the Holy Spirit. Hence we see the foundation of what we might now call encounter with the divine; for Wesley this was perceptible inspiration. Whereas the accusation that Wesley was guilty of enthusiasm is widely known, his nuanced correspondence on encountering the Holy Spirit may be less well observed. Thankfully, Cunningham's presentation of the correspondence will enable the reader to see it as setting out some of the core principles of the very nature of a Methodist understanding of salvation. In the chapters that follow Cunningham succeeds in setting out how Wesley thought a believer encountered God, how life was transformed (that being more than a one-off event of transformation), and how a conversation then takes place. Taking up (in the Methodist sense of course) classical themes of grace, faith, and witness we begin to see that the concerns articulated in the correspondence remained with Wesley throughout his ministry and this is an area to which he returned, albeit in slightly different contexts, on several occasions. Cunningham makes it clear that for Wesley, to encounter the Spirit meant a very real sense of transformation. He brings the point home, reminding us that for Wesley the Spirit's operation is rooted in the atonement and justification (50). A claim of itself worthy of further consideration, much like the delightful aside that Wesley was relatively uninterested in the question of Trinitarian dynamics (42); there, of course, is an important insight. At numerous points in this work we see again the sense of urgency that Wesley (and early Methodism?) felt about articulating that a personal encounter with the Spirit was vital.All of this raises questions about how Methodism, particularly in the early years, ordered itself, viewed the sacraments, shaped its worship, understood the Bible, and how the believer ordered her life in light of encountering the Spirit. Cunningham makes a reference to the later by citing ‘Wesley's theology of happiness’ (129) and making a link to the use of riches (money). Sadly, this is where the exploration stops, although the reader is left with a clear line of thought that there was a deeply practical application of the discourse of the Oxford don in his letter to the unknown John Smith for the people called Methodist. The consequences of Wesley's views of perceptible inspiration for the early the early Societies is perhaps the next stage in this work.There is a slight quibble, which does not detract from the overall work, but is surprising nonetheless. There is scant attention here to the work of Charles Wesley. The passing references to one of his sermons is a point of interest in itself, but not to mention the hymns seems curious for, after all, not only do they say a great deal about perceptible inspiration and Trinitarian dynamics, but they carry with them some imprimatur of John.Cunningham has produced a detailed exploration of Wesley's thought and in so doing has applied a rigorous theological and philosophical critique to correspondence and sermons. Throughout the work we are reminded of the interconnectedness of much of Wesley's writing and thought, and as such the basis of a Methodist theological (and one may argue here philosophical) method. This work will be of considerable value and may prove to be a definitive text while, it is to be hoped, encouraging the exploration of other areas of Wesley's theology as grounded in encounter with the divine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2450.143

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.298
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesley and Methodist StudiesSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207