Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Theoretical Engagements in Geopolitical Economy (Research in Political Economy, Vol. 30A), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. ix. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0161-72302015000030A004 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Jacob Assa Department of Economics, New School of Social Research, New York, NY, USA Radhika Desai Department of Political Studies, Geopolitical Economy Research Group, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada Vladan Hodulak Department of International Relations and European Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic Paul Kellogg Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Canada Oldrich Krpec Department of International Relations and European Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic James Parisot Department of Sociology, Binghamton University, Vestal, NY, USA Sébastien Rioux Department of Geography, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada Steve Rolf School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK Ray Silvius Department of Political Science, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Canada Kees van der Pijl Centre for Global Political Economy, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK Book Chapters Theoretical Engagements in Geopolitical Economy Research in Political Economy Theoretical Engagements in Geopolitical Economy Copyright Page Editorial Advisory Board List of Contributors Introduction: From the Neoclassical Diversion to Geopolitical Economy The Uneven and Combined Development of International Historical Sociology The Collapse of ‘The International Imagination’: A Critique of the Transhistorical Approach to Uneven and Combined Development Locating the State: Uneven and Combined Development, the States System and the Political Expanding Geopolitical Economy: A Critique of the Theory of Successive Hegemonies Gross Domestic Power: Geopolitical Economy and the History of National Accounts Military Power and Trade Policy – Roots of Contemporary Geopolitical Economy Understanding Eurasian Integration and Contestation in the Post-Soviet Conjuncture: Lessons from Geopolitical Economy and Critical Historicism Geographies of Capital Accumulation: Tracing the Emergence of Multi-polarity, 1980–2014
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.719 | 0.697 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".