Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les représentations de femmes noires dans l’art occidental déflent toute classification facile. Les catégories traditionnelles du nu (« nude/naked ») en histoire de l’art, fondées sur un discours psychanalytique européocentrique et sur des normes colonialistes de beauté et de comportement sexuel sont inaptes à transiger avec la complexité de la représentation du corps de la femme noire. Cette représentation a connu historiquement une double fétichisation, fondée à la fois sur une perception d’un manque racial et sexuel. Le Nu de couleur , 1932, de Dorothy Stevens est symptomatique de cette fétichisation unique, état qui reste indicatif du positionnement de la « femme noire » comme l’autre de la féminité blanche idéalisée. Pendant que Nu de couleur situe la « femme noire » comme étant sexuellement agressive, exotique et hors norme, les nus féminins contemporains apparemment inoffensifs révèlent une tradition d’opposition délibérément fondée sur la race.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".