MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237923542 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-13917

Background Rejection in Two-Phase Xenon using Scintillation Pulse-Shape Discrimination for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Searches

2020· dissertation· en· W4237923542 on OpenAlexaff
Braeden Veenstra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillationPhotomultiplierPhysicsDouble beta decayXenonNuclear physicsScintillatorSilicon photomultiplierGamma rayScintillation counterOpticsDetectorNeutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work attempted to identify measurable differences in the pulse shapes of one and two electron scintillation events in liquid xenon, with the goal of developing a technique for improved background rejection in neutrinoless double-beta decay (0νββ) experiments.A system was constructed to generate one and two electron events using gamma rays from an external thorium-228 source.Sodium iodide counters were used to tag one and two electron events, which were produced from Compton scattering and pair-production of the thorium gamma respectively.A novel cryogenic compatible silicon photomultiplier was used to measure the light from scintillation events and it was demonstrated that the system could trigger on coincidence between the scintillation and event tag signals.No conclusions could be made on the timing structure of events, based on long decay times in the photomultiplier and electronics, and suggestions are made for future improvements.v List of Acronyms 0νββ neutrinoless double-beta decay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207