MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237925987 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-12210

Adaptive Coverage for Future LTE Networks

2017· dissertation· en· W4237925987 on OpenAlexaff
Rami Sabouni

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBase stationCellular networkPaceThroughputQuality of serviceMetric (unit)Wireless networkDistributed computingUser equipmentMacroFunction (biology)Energy consumptionOptimization problemWirelessComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past few decades, wireless communications have been growing rapidly and the growth rate is accelerating at a very fast pace.In order to meet this growing demand, researchers are struggling to solve two fundamental problems: (1) providing the spectrum resources needed to support clusters of dense users with very high data rate and (2) supplying the required spectrum at reasonable power requirement level.This thesis first outlines the extent of this capacity-power problem now and in the near future and discusses possible approaches to meet these difficult challenges.We start by introducing a new metric, called Total Energy Per Bit (TEPB), to be used as a measure for greening of the network.Then, a proposed vision of replacing Macro-eNBs with a large number of Pico-eNBs to bring the network closer to the users is provided.This naturally leads to casting the problem as an optimization problem with an objective function of minimizing the overall power consumption while supporting user demand with acceptable quality of service.Based on the optimization problem, we propose two algorithms based on the concept of self organizing network (SON) to switch on/off base stations.Simulation results show that both proposed switch on/off algorithms can improve the power requirement of the network while maintaining the required UE throughput by reducing the TEPB significantly.i Many people supported me during the completion of this thesis with criticism, helpful assistance and references.This thesis would have never been possible without them. I am greatly thankful to my supervisors Prof. Roshdy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207