MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237949799 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13517

The host specificity of the candidate biological control agent Diadromus collaris (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)

2019· dissertation· en· W4237949799 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Cock

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIchneumonidaeDiamondback mothPlutellaPlutellidaeParasitoidBiologyHymenopteraLepidoptera genitaliaPupaZoologyEcologyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diadromus collaris (Gravenhorst) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a solitary pupal endoparasitoid of Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is a candidate for introduction into Canada as a biological control agent.It is important to assess the parasitoid's host specificity before its release.To maximize the wasp's expressed host range, I tested five variables to determine which experimental conditions would motivate D. collaris to oviposit.Of these variables, wasp diet, exposure length, and the presence or absence of diamondback moth cocoons resulted in statistically significant differences in D. collaris emergence or diamondback moth mortality.To determine the parasitoid's fundamental host range, I exposed pupae from eight species of non-target Lepidoptera to female D. collaris in a series of no-choice tests.Three species, Plutella armoraciae, Plutella porrectella, and Acrolepiopsis assectella, were suitable hosts for D. collaris development.The results from this study provide insight into the suitability of the parasitoid for introduction into Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207