MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4237950056 · doi:10.22215/etd/2010-09199

Characterization of optically sensitive polymer and application to microwave antenna

2010· dissertation· en· W4237950056 on OpenAlexaff
Tosin Morolari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityCanadian HeritageLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)MicrowaveAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsPhysicsArtOpticsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the rapid growth in wireless networks in recent years, there is a need for a tunable microwave device to be able to effectively switch between different networks and wireless technologies.This thesis investigates the use of a photoconductive polymer to optically tune a microwave device or antenna.The dielectric properties of a hybrid (Polymer + Cadmium Sulphide) photoconductive polymer are extracted using microwave reflection measurements on a coplanar waveguide test structure.The material under test was overlaid on an interdigitated capacitor that was fabricated on a transparent glass substrate.The material characterization was done with and without broadband optical illumination.The material parameters were obtained by fitting measured reflection coefficient data to an equivalent lumped element circuit or HFSS model in ADS.The results obtained from the characterization show that the polymer was photoconductive.The extracted dielectric constant (e r) of 4 and loss tangent (tan d) of 0.004 were obtained without illumination, while the loss tangent increased to 0.1 1 with illumination but the e r value had no measureable change.The properties of the novel photoconductive polymer were used in the theoretical design of an optically tunable dipole antenna.The antenna was designed for GSM band (1900MHz to 2100MHz).The tunability in the antenna was achieved by applying the characterized polymer along a slotted segment of the dipole arm, and effectively changing the dipole length by optical illumination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→