MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237958579 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db223740

Kenyan elections will not see protracted conflict

2017· other· en· W4237958579 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidential systemOpposition (politics)GovernorUnemploymentPollingKenyaPolitical scienceAllianceVotingQuarter (Canadian coin)General electionEconomicsPolitical economyEconomic growthEngineeringLawPoliticsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance After a mostly smooth and peaceful voting process, the electronic results transmission system allowed preliminary results for the presidential race to be streamed live online by the IEBC shortly after polling closed. Figures showing a comfortable first-round win for Kenyatta were swiftly overshadowed by claims of major fraud by opposition leader Raila Odinga of the National Super Alliance (NASA). Impacts Local businesses may remain closed as long as fears of violence persist. The next president will face significant economic challenges, including high inflation, a large wage bill and rising unemployment. Public sector wage freezes that had been deferred due to the election may now follow, generating economic contestation. The final quarter of 2017 could see increased economic activity as investments that were put on hold pending the elections are completed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207