MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237989913 · doi:10.4018/9781605669823.ch108

Hyperlink Structure Inspired by Web Usage

2011· book-chapter· en· W4237989913 on OpenAlexaff
Pawan Lingras, Rucha Lingras

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperlinkComputer scienceWorld Wide WebVisualizationInformation retrievalLink analysisGraphWeb navigationThe InternetWeb miningWeb pageData scienceData miningTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes how Web usage patterns can be used to improve the navigational structure of a Web site. The discussion begins with an illustration of visualization tools that study aggregate and individual link traversals. The use of data mining techniques such as classification, association, and sequence analysis to discover knowledge about Web usage, such as navigational patterns, is also discussed. Finally, a graph theoretic algorithm to create an optimal navigational hyperlink structure, based on known navigation patterns, is presented. The discussion is supported by analysis of realworld datasets.Request access from your librarian to read this chapter's full text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207