MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237994607 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.12089535

Encrypted Communications: It's not what it seems.

2020· preprint· en· W4237994607 on OpenAlexaff
Neelkumar Patel, Jay Sukhadiya, Jinan Fiaidhi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceOn-the-fly encryptionComputer securitySecure communicationCommunication sourceAndroid (operating system)Computer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div>Secure communications is when two entities communicate with each other and the communication is completely secured from a third party or the intruder. This type of communication process can be achieved using encryption and decryption mechanism. The implementation of Email encryption is performed with the intension of showing the working of encryption and decryption mechanism. This web application allows user to send an encrypted electronic-mail to any domain and it can be only decrypted using the receiver’s private key. Whereas, messaging android application was developed to replicate existing WhatsApp application to see whether, it performs end-to-end encryption or it’s not what it seems. The application allows users to securely communicate with each other via performing actual end-to-end encryption.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207