MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237999270 · doi:10.31227/osf.io/xq32d

Pemetaan Potensi Wilayah Desa Tileng, Kecamatan Girisubo, Kabupaten Gunungkidul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

2018· preprint· id· W4237999270 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Isnaini Sadali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryBusinessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kajian ini secara umum memiliki tujuan memetakan potensi wilayah, khususnya terkait dengan potensi pertanian dan peternakan. Desa Tileng merupakan salah satu wilayah yang berada di perbukitan karst, sehingga sumberdaya air di lokasi ini cukup terbatas. Potensi Desa Tileng selain pada sektor pertanian juga terdapat potensi pariwisata. Pengembangan wilayah melalui pariwisata mampu dilakukan pada unit desa maupun unit wilayah yang lebih kecil seperti “kampung”. Program pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini berfokus pada pemetaan potensi wilayah yang kadang belum diketahui atau terabaikan, sehingga diharapkan mampu memberikan alternatif solusi permasalahan dan meminimalisir dampak dari masalah yang dihadapi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207