MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238018401 · doi:10.29173/ikc3783

Emplacement of the Snap Lake kimberlite intrusion, NW Territories, Arctic Canada

2019· article· en· W4238018401 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Kimberlite Conference Extended Abstracts: 2012 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKimberliteArcticIntrusionGeologyEarth scienceSnapGeochemistryOceanographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cambrian (523 Ma) Snap Lake hypabyssal kimberlite intrusion, Northwest Territories, Canada, is a complex segmented diamond-bearing ore-body. Detailed geological investigations suggest that the kimberlite is a multi-phase intrusion with at least four different magmatic lithofacies. In particular, olivine-rich (phlogopite-poor) and olivinepoor (phlogopite-rich) varieties of hypabyssal kimberlite have been identified. Key observations are that olivine-rich lithofacies (ORK) has a strong tendency to be located where the intrusion is thickest and that there is a good correlation between intrusion thickness, olivine crystal size and crystal content. The olivine-poor lithofacies (OPK) tends to be most abundant where the intrusion is thinnest. The ORK groundmass is composed of phlogopite (3 -20%), apatite, Cr spinel with Fe-Ti rims and rutile. The OPK groundmass is composed of abundant phlogopite (30 -60%), monazite and rutile and sparse Cr spinel cores and remnants of Fe-Ti rims. The ORK and OPK have a very different mineralogy and geochemistry indicating that they are contrasted magmas with different igneous histories, which have been mixed together in the intrusion. In addition, the ORK and OPK are characterised by different diamond abundances and size distributions. The geometry and distribution of lithofacies points to magmatic co-intrusion, and flow segregation driven by fundamental rheological differences between the ORK and OPK phases. We envisage that the low viscosity OPK magma acted as a lubricant for the highly viscous ORK magma. The presence of such low viscosity, crystal-poor magmas may explain how crystalladen kimberlite magmas (> 60 vol.%) are able to reach the surface and erupt in kimberlite diatremes. We also document the absence of crystal settling and the development of an unusual sub-vertical fabric of elongate olivine crystals, which are explained by rapid degassinginduced quench crystallisation of the magmas during and after intrusion. The igneous events have been followed by multiple stages of metasomatism, including (1) early metasomatism, (2) serpentinization, and (3) alteration by acidic fluids derived from the surrounding granite. The Snap Lake intrusion provides important insights into the architecture and dynamics of magmatic plumbing systems at high crustal levels, particularly in settings where sheet intrusions feed into point-source diatreme-vent systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it