MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238021658 · doi:10.1079/dmpd/20066500828

<i>Peach latent mosaic viroid</i> . [Distribution map].

2006· article· en· W4238021658 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CABI, EPPO

Bibliographic record

VenueDistribution Maps of Plant Diseases · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMosaicPrunusChinaDistribution (mathematics)GeographyBiologyGenusPlant virusBotanyArchaeologyVirologyVirus

Abstract

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Peach latent mosaic viroid Viroids: Family Avsunviroidae: Genus Pelamoviroid Hosts: Mainly peach ( Prunus persica ), but also some other Prunus spp. Information is given on the geographical distribution in EUROPE, Austria, France, Greece, Italy, Romania, Spain, Yugoslavia, (Fed, Rep.) ASIA, China, Liaoning, Japan, Lebanon, AFRICA, Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, NORTH AMERICA, Canada, British Columbia, Mexico, USA, California, Colorado, Oregon, Virginia, Washington, OCEANIA, Australia, South Australia.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: about_only · design weight: 3321.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Plant pathology distribution map for Peach latent mosaic viroid; a geographic data note about a pathogen.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

The work maps the geographic distribution of a plant viroid rather than studying research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Plant disease distribution map; object is a plant pathogen, not research practice.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDistribution Maps of Plant DiseasesSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207