MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability

2012· other· en· W4238026409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate social responsibilityStakeholderCorporate governanceCorporate securityCorporate sustainabilityBusinessSocial responsibilityAccountingPublic relationsPolitical scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2012), "Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability", Tench, R., Sun, W. and Jones, B. (Ed.) Corporate Social Irresponsibility: A Challenging Concept (Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. ii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-9059(2012)0000004023 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited Book Chapters Corporate Social Irresponsibility: A Challenging Concept Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability Copyright Page List of Tables List of Figures List of Contributors Editorial Advisory and Review Board About the Editors About the Authors Acknowledgements The Challenging Concept of Corporate Social Irresponsibility: An Introduction What CSR is not: Corporate Social Irresponsibility A Rather Delicious Paradox: Social Responsibility and the Manufacture of Armaments The Structural Contradictions and Constraints on Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges for Corporate Social Irresponsibility The Janus Dialectic of Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Corporate Social Responsibility – The Role of Micro-Moments Economic Rationality and Corporate Social Irresponsibility: An Illustrative Review of Social Capital Theory Rating Agencies as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Power and Trust Production in Debt Capital Markets Organisations Behaving Badly – The Role of Communication in Understanding CSI and CSR Reconstructing Stakeholder Relationships Using ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ as a Response Strategy to Cases of Corporate Irresponsibility: The Case of the 2010 BP Spill in the Gulf of Mexico The Structural Dynamics of Corporate Social Irresponsibility: The Case of the Canadian Mining Industry The Community Obligations of Canadian Oil Companies: A Case Study of Talisman in the Sudan Impact of Corporate Social Irresponsibility on the Corporate Image and Reputation of Multinational Oil Corporations in Nigeria The Irresponsible Enterprise: The Ethics of Corporate Downsizing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.336
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.336
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.013
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainabilitySame topicCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingFrench-language works237,207