Bibliographic record
Abstract
In October the scientists from many countries assembled in Tallinn University of Technology to participate at the 14th Baltic Electronics Conference (BEC2014). With this act we continue the long living tradition already over the 25-year BEC conference series initiated in 1987. The BEC2014 conference was held in Tallinn and Laulasmaa. The main organizers were the Thomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics together with the Department of Computer Engineering of Tallinn University of Technology (TUT). Support was given by the TUT Technomedicum, and Departments of Computer Science, and of Electrical Engineering. The IEEE Circuits and Systems branch gave the technical sponsorship to our conference. The Competence Centre in Electronics, Info- and Communication Technologies ELKO supported our event from the side of industry and the Laulasmaa Spa Resort gave us many benefits to run our conference in the very nice landscape at the Baltic Sea not very far from Tallinn. In response to the call for papers the International Program Committee we received over 70 papers, mostly from Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Finland, Sweden, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Germany, Russia, and Poland, but even from USA, Canada, Great Britain, France, Spain, Netherlands, Denmark, Ukraine, Egypt and Algeria. Finally the Conference program featured 8 invited papers and 58 papers for oral presentation. The conference continues the tradition to be the forum for the presentation of the latest research and development results in the area of electronics, micro- and nanotechnologies, embedded systems, dependable computing, signal processing, and RF electronics in the Baltic Sea Region and wider. The conference attracted contributions covering design, analysis, simulation, optimization, and process simulation in component and system electronics, microsystems technology, and embedded systems. All of the papers in the conference proceedings have been directly reproduced from the materials submitted by the authors and all accepted papers will be referred by the IEEEXplore Database.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.500 | 0.355 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".