MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238029491 · doi:10.1017/s0252921100030797

Optical Identification of X-ray Sources in a High X-ray Flux Sensitivity Area from the RASS

2002· article· en· W4238029491 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raúl Mújica, F. J. Zickgraf, V. Chavushyan, Yectivani Juárez, A. Serrano, I. Appenzeller, J. Krautter

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Astronomical Union Colloquium · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsROSATFlux (metallurgy)Quarter (Canadian coin)Sensitivity (control systems)SkyX-rayIdentification (biology)Environmental sciencePhysicsAstrophysicsOpticsGeographyMaterials scienceEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We have optically identified a complete sub-sample of ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) X-ray sources contained in 6 study areas. Of the original 12° × 12° area near the NEP, only one-quarter was observed until now in order to keep the number of sources to a manageable size. This area is of particular interest because the RASS integration time is about a factor of ten longer than in the other areas and therefore a factor of 3-4 deeper in flux. We have started to observe the RASS sources in the remaining 3/4 of this area. First results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Astronomical Union ColloquiumSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207