In Company Virtual Networking for HSE Professionals: The HSE Global Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In company virtual networking for HSE professionals: the HSE Global Network Paul Gerlings; Paul Gerlings Shell E&P Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Charlie Malone; Charlie Malone Shell E&P Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Robin Harding Robin Harding Shell E&P Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86808-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86808-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Gerlings, Paul, Malone, Charlie, and Robin Harding. "In company virtual networking for HSE professionals: the HSE Global Network." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86808-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractThis contribution describes the HSE Global Network since its launch January 2002 in Shell Exploration and Production. The HSE Global Network is a virtual community of HSE professionals. It uses a combination of a web-based database, daily email notifications, backed up with monthly teleconferences and annual workshops. The network has grown organically in membership as well as number of exchanges. The content of the network is mostly solving practical HSE issues. The biggest benefits of networking are (1) speed of developing solutions and (2) improved quality of HSE solutions.An explanation of the success of the network is suggested, by locating its place in the Knowledge Production cycle at the induction side. It is suggested it counterbalances the traditional deductive/ prescriptive top-down approach. The challenges for the coming years are (1) to enable this top half of the knowledge production cycle to take its place in the Network and (2) to unlock and disclose the information captured for future reference.IntroductionHSE professionals are commonly a couple percent of an organisation in the upstream industry. To their immediate co-workers HSE is important as a boundary condition, rather than a problem. The 'HSE guy' is the person who gets the questions and has to find answers, today rather than tomorrow. The HSE professionals are confronted with a wide variety of topics, some of which they master, but most they only have an awareness level in terms of knowledge.HSE professionals have their traditional network: they meet peers at conferences, courses and in professional organisations. They call friends, mail colleagues, etc. They read professional magazines to keep abreast with what is available. When it comes to quick fire answers. this informal network is vital. However, such traditional networks have serious limitations: the maximum number of a persons in such a network is 100; keeping up with who knows what is very time consuming. In addition, often these quick fire answers cannot be given as a person with the right knowledge is out of the office.Enter the HSE Global Network (HSEGN) within Shell Exploration and Production, a web-based bulletin board system that sends out daily email notifications of new postings. This contribution describes the HSE GN since its launch January 2002 and tries to explain its success by comparing it with the empirical cycle of knowledge production and confirmation.Networking Among HSE ProfessionalsIn their jobs, HSE professionals have a set of standards, guidelines, procedures and rules, to which they have to comply in an auditable manner. They have a network of peers and seniors to which they can turn to in case they face questions they don't have an answer for or where the guidelines are not 100% clear. This is done by visits, phone calls or emails. Table 1 gives examples of new and probably solved problems that HSE professionals face, from different scientific disciplines. Keywords: information, coordinator, upstream oil & gas, hse global network paul, exploration, hse professional, society of petroleum engineers, knowledge management, notification, company virtual networking Subjects: Professionalism, Training, and Education, Information Management and Systems, Communities of practice, Knowledge management This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".