MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238101876 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jju027.331

P214. Ulcerative Proctitis: Predictors and outcomes of disease extension in UC

2015· article· en· W4238101876 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Mosli, Guangyong Zou, Sushil Kumar Garg, Sean Feagan, J Macdonald, William J. Sandborn, Nilesh Chande, Brian G. Feagan, Ana Gutiérrez, Íngrid Ordás, Ignacio Marín‐Jiménez, Joaquín Hinojosa, Jordi Rimola, Asunción Torregrosa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreVictoria HospitalWestern UniversityRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProctitisExtension (predicate logic)MedicineUlcerative colitisDiseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results: For differentiating between patients with mild and moderate disease (i.e.Mayo score of 3-5 or 6-10, respectively), we identified alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) (AUC=0.79)with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 and 0.70, respectively, thereby outperforming the predictability of CRP (AUC=0.52).The combination of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and AAT produced predictive models for differentiating mild and moderate disease (AUC=0.72)as well as moderate and severe disease (AUC=0.96)with the latter showing the same predictability as CRP.Conclusions: Based on the measurements of AAT and G-CSF we were able to differentiate between patient having mild, moderate and severe disease activity.Identification of these potential serum biomarkers measured by a commercially available platform enables clinicians to optimize and individualize the treatment at an early stage while awaiting endoscopic examinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory DisordersFrench-language works237,207