MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Society for Promotion of Roman Studies

2018· book-chapter· en· W4238122814 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Studies and Philology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilArts and Humanities Research CouncilDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaScience and Engineering Research BoardSavoy FoundationSociety of Architectural HistoriansSamuel H. Kress Foundation
KeywordsPromotion (chess)Political scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roman Society, Room 252, South Block, Senate House, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HU, England Tel: (44) 020 7862 8727 Fax: (44) 020 7862 8728 Email: office@romansociety.org Website: www.romansociety.org Contact: Dr Fiona Haarer, Secretary of Society

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5560.553

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicClassical Studies and PhilologyFrench-language works237,207