Bibliographic record
Abstract
Societies around the world are significantly influenced by kinship in one way or another. It can be argued that kinship is in decline; however, there are new and emerging ways of looking at kinship. Goode's major thesis posits that the expansion of economic systems vis‐à‐vis industrialization leads to the decentralization of extended kinship bonds. Instead, the conjugal family takes shape and becomes the central and independent kinship unit. Conjugal families, similar to the nuclear family, are small marriage‐ and children‐based families and at one point were the dominant Western industrial family model. Parsons states that adults are part of two conjugal families: the one that they are born into and the second that they form in adulthood. Goode followed the modernization thesis in that all of the “developing world” would move from more traditional to conjugal families once industrialization had occurred, leading to weakened family control over matters such as marriage partner selection. In the latter part of the twentieth century, people were more likely to postpone marriage, get divorced, have children outside marriage, have premarital sex, and cohabit. These societal changes and effects on kin were not predicted in Goode's original analysis of conjugal families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".