MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238198524 · doi:10.4324/9781315579467-4

Transspecies Urban Theory: Chickens in an African City

2016· book-chapter· en· W4238198524 on OpenAlexafffund
Alice J. Hovorka

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersYork University
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter outlines transspecies urban theory as grounded in animal agency and the concept of encounter. It highlights the role and significance of livestock in African cities, drawing on the re-animation of urban scholarship. African cities are sites of interspecies encounters and mingling that shape urban form, function and dynamics, and that transform the capacities and potential of the human and nonhuman animal dwellers that reside there. In particular, domesticated livestock animals such as chickens, goats, sheep, donkeys and cattle, serve as pivotal actors in urban and peri-urban areas given their vital role in people&s;s everyday lives and national development agendas. The chapter focuses on animal geography to offer new perspectives on urban theory that incorporate animal actors. It examines the case of chickens and people in Greater Gaborone, Botswana, offering insights on how urbanization processes are inextricably wrapped up in human-animal relations, and revealing the dialectical relationships between chickens, people, and the city.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrimate Behavior and EcologyFrench-language works237,207