MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238247258 · doi:10.1111/rest.12605

Issue Information

2020· paratext· en· W4238247258 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Laura Fernández‐González, Renais Sance, Craig Pickett, Jenifer Cabrera, Jennifer Richards, Kevin Killeen, Alessandra Petrina, Rachel Willie, Anna Groundwater, Richard Wistreich, Jane Grogan, James P. Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance Studies · 2020
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Iberia
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversità di BolognaUniversity of SussexUniversity of OxfordUniversity of St AndrewsSociety for Renaissance StudiesYork UniversityFlorida State UniversityUniversity of ExeterUniversiteit LeidenBarnard CollegeUniversity of LeicesterUniversité de MontréalUniversity of WarwickNorthwestern UniversityHarvard UniversityHelsingin YliopistoBritish School at RomeUniversity of TorontoUniversity College LondonEmory University
KeywordsThe RenaissanceCitationComputer scienceLibrary scienceHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9280.876

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance StudiesSame topicMedieval and Early Modern IberiaFrench-language works237,207