Quarterly Management Document – FY18, 1st Quarter, Physics-based Creep Simulations of Thick Section Welds in High Temperature and Pressure Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the 1st quarter of FY18 modeling and simulation of the creep of thick section welds continued although some workscope from FY17 still needs to be completed. Four stress drop tests to determine the threshold stress for creep in Alloy 740H were carried out. One has finished and post-test analysis shows a threshold creep stress of about 67 MPa which is lower than that found in a previous program for Alloy 617 at the same temperature. Alloy 617 is not as creep resistant as Alloy 740H and the reason for the lower than expected threshold stress for Alloy 740H is being investigated further. Also analysis of the gamma prime particle size in an aging study closely follows the aging characteristics of gamma prime in Alloy 617. Further analysis of other aged materials will be carried out during the 2nd quarter of FY18 to confirm that the aging characteristic of Alloy 740H are the same as that for Alloy 617.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".