MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 2876: Early Retention and Subsequent Engraftment of Transplanted Progenitor Cells is Improved by Delivery within Collagen Matrix

2008· article· en· W4238303109 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Zhang, Marc Lamoureux, Stephanie Thorn, Vincent Chan, Joel Price, Robert B Beanlands, Jean N. DaSilva, Robert A. deKemp, Erik J. Suuronen, Marc Ruel

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiodistributionProgenitor cellMedicineIn vivoNuclear medicineMatrix (chemical analysis)Ex vivoImmunohistochemistryPositron emission tomographyPathologyStem cellChemistryCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To investigate the mechanisms involved in the potentiation of cell therapy by delivery matrices, we evaluated the retention and engraftment of transplanted human circulating progenitor cells (CPCs) injected in a collagen matrix by using in vivo positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, ex vivo biodistribution, and immunohistochemistry. Methods: CPCs were labeled with 18 F-FDG and injected with or without a collagen type I-based matrix in the ischemic hindlimb muscle (IM) of rats (2x10 6 cells; n=15/group). Localization of cells was acquired by PET imaging (15 min) at 150 min post-injection. In addition, radionuclide biodistribution, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemical examination of transplanted CPCs were performed at up to 14 days. Results: Cell labeling efficiency was CPC-concentration dependent (r=0.61, p <0.001), but not 18 F-FDG-dose dependent. Labeled CPCs exhibited excellent short-term stability and viability. Persistence of 18 F-FDG radioactivity in cells was markedly greater than non-specific retention in the matrix. Wholebody (WB) PET images revealed better CPC retention in the IM and less non-specific leakage to other tissues when CPCs were delivered within the matrix (IM/WB retention ratio of 43.9±8.2%), compared to cells injected alone (22.3±10.4%; p =0.040) and to 18 F-FDG injected with or without the matrix (9.7±5.5% and 11.0±5.5%, respectively; p <0.005). Radioactivity biodistribution confirmed that accumulation was increased (by 92.5%; p =0.024) in the IM and reduced (by 1.1 to 23.8%; p <0.05) in non-specific tissues when cells were injected within the matrix, compared to cells injected alone. Anti-human mitochondria staining showed increased cell retention in the IM with use of matrices (3.0±2.1%) versus cells only (1.9±0.8%; p =0.048). At 14 days the number of CD31 + transplanted human cells was greater (1.6±0.1%) when injected within the matrix than injected alone (0.7±0.1%; p =0.004). Conclusions: Collagen-based delivery matrices improve the early retention of transplanted CPCs, which in turn favors subsequent cell engraftment in the ischemic tissue. This mechanism conferred by the matrix has potential implications for the optimization of cell therapy at the early stages after cell delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207