MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238310787 · doi:10.1002/9781118694077.ch3

Decoding

2014· other· en· W4238310787 on OpenAlexaff
Leszek Szczeciński, Alex Alvarado

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsA priori and a posterioriKey (lock)Computer scienceMaximum a posteriori estimationAlgorithmMaximum likelihoodMathematicsStatisticsPhilosophyComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter studies different decoding strategies. The optimal maximum a posteriori (MAP) and maximum likelihood (ML) decoding strategies are introduced in the chapter. It also introduces the L-values which become a key element used throughout this book. The chapter defines the bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) decoder. The decoding may be carried out optimally using L-values. The chapter also discusses some important properties of L-values. In BICM, the L-values are calculated at the receiver and are used to convey information about the a posteriori probability of the transmitted bits. These signals are then used by the BICM decoder. The chapter concludes with a discussion on hard-decision decoding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207