Abstracts of Presentations of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of The American Society of Primatologists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large number of studies have been published that investigate ultimate and proximate variables that are related to social dominance. In this symposium, we will review past studies that have been performed, and update those findings with current research, concluding with a discussion of the current studies, as well as the future studies that need to be performed. Dr. Irwin Bernstein will present research that is the basis of much research that is performed today. He will outline the conceptual and methodological difficulties that have encumbered the field of primatology. He will be followed by Dr. Bernard Chapais who will present research investigating the proximate factors underlying matrilineal rank in macaques. Dr. Lynn Fairbanks will present data showing that while dominance in vervets generally follow the rules identified for macaques, this system seems to break down when the matriarch is lost, either through natural death or experimental removal. As with Dr. Chapais' research, her data show that for males, the acquisition and maintenance of social dominance is a product of competent social behaviors, and not simply a result of aggressiveness. Dr J. Dee Higley will conclude the presentations with recent research showing that in the absence of a matriline, early rearing experiences affect the acquisition of social dominance, with impoverished rearing experiences such as surrogate-peer-rearing producing long lasting low social dominance rank. Dr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".