MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238353843 · doi:10.4000/communication.4181

Kate NASH et Alan SCOTT (dir.) (2001), The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology

2005· article· en· W4238353843 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yves Laberge

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPoliticsClassicsLaw and economicsPhilosophyArtPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

D’une manière audacieuse, les coresponsables de cet ouvrage collectif proposent de définir par la négative cette intersection fertile et mal délimitée, en s’interrogeant sur ce qui ne ferait pas partie de la sociologie politique, au sein de ces deux grandes disciplines que sont la science politique et la sociologie (p. 1). En fait, loin de s’attarder sur des aspects de deuxième ordre, la sociologie politique privilégie des champs que semblent parfois négliger les deux grandes disciplines don...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207