Bibliographic record
Abstract
Other| April 01, 2006 New mineral names* Andrew J. Locock; Andrew J. Locock 1Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Paula C. Piilonen; Paula C. Piilonen † 2Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Stn. D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada †E-mail: ppiilonen@mus-nature.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar T. Scott Ercit; T. Scott Ercit 2Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Stn. D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada ‡English translations of articles are available upon request from T.S.E. (sercit@mus-nature.ca) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ralph Rowe; Ralph Rowe 2Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Stn. D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Uwe Kolitsch Uwe Kolitsch 3Institut für Mineralogie und Kristallographie, Geozentrum, Universität Wien, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Wien, Austria Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Andrew J. Locock 1Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C6, Canada Paula C. Piilonen † 2Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Stn. D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada T. Scott Ercit ‡English translations of articles are available upon request from T.S.E. (sercit@mus-nature.ca) 2Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Stn. D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada Ralph Rowe 2Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Stn. D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada Uwe Kolitsch 3Institut für Mineralogie und Kristallographie, Geozentrum, Universität Wien, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Wien, Austria †E-mail: ppiilonen@mus-nature.ca Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1945-3027 Print ISSN: 0003-004X © 2006 American Mineralogist American Mineralogist (2006) 91 (4): 710–715. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2006.463 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Andrew J. Locock, Paula C. Piilonen, T. Scott Ercit, Ralph Rowe, Uwe Kolitsch; New mineral names. American Mineralogist 2006;; 91 (4): 710–715. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2006.463 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyAmerican Mineralogist Search Advanced Search J. Sejkora, P. Novotný, M. Novák, V. Šrein, P. Berlepsch (2005) Calciopetersite from DomaŠov nad Bystřicí, northern Moravia, Czech Republic, a new mineral species of the mixite group. Can. Mineral., 43, 1393–1400. Calciopetersite forms translucent to transparent minute acicular crystals, up to 0.4 mm in length and 5–20 μm in width, with a hexagonal outline, clustered in fine radiating sprays (up to 0.1–0.5 mm). The mineral is brittle and soft (hardness not measured), olive green, light olive green streak, vitreous, nonfluorescent, with uneven fracture and no observed cleavage. Calciopetersite is pleochroic, light green with yellowish tint (O) to dark green... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.766 | 0.655 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".