Vasodilation in human subcutaneous arteries induced by neuropeptide Y is mediated by neuropeptide Y Y<sub>1</sub>receptors and is nitric oxide dependent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is known as a potent vasoconstrictor of peripheral blood vessels both in vivo and in vitro. There have been reports suggesting that NPY also has a dilatory effect. The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether NPY dilates small human subcutaneous arteries. Subcutaneous arteries, obtained from patients undergoing abdominal surgery, were mounted in in vitro tissue baths, and the vascular responses to NPY were investigated. The presence of mRNA encoding the human NPY Y1receptor in endothelial cells from human umbilical veins was studied by the use of reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In arteries precontracted with the prostaglandin analogue U46619, NPY induced a concentration-dependent vasodilation (Emax30 ± 10% of the U46619-induced contraction), which was significantly inhibited by the NPY Y1receptor antagonist BIBP3226 (1 µM), causing a rightward shift of the concentration-response curve, pEC507.1 ± 0.3 vs. 7.7 ± 0.3 for NPY alone. After pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthetase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (10 µM), the dilation was abolished (Emax6 ± 5% of the U46619-induced contraction). mRNA encoding the human NPY Y1receptor was detected in endothelial cells from human umbilical veins. It was concluded that NPY induces vasodilation in human subcutaneous arteries. The dilation is mediated via the NPY Y1receptor and is dependent on nitric oxide.Key words: vasodilation, neuropeptide Y, BIBP3226, nitric oxide, human.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".