MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238407683 · doi:10.1002/047147844x.sw296

Flood Prevention

2004· other· en· W4238407683 on OpenAlexaff
Slobodan P. Simonović

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Encyclopedia · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythFlooding (psychology)Flood preventionSection (typography)Environmental planningFlood stageNatural (archaeology)Order (exchange)GeographyEnvironmental resource managementBusinessEnvironmental science100-year floodAdvertisingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although people cannot do much about floods, they can influence the nature and extent of flood losses. The latter can be achieved through flood management policies and programs. The first section of this contribution describes some of the causes of flooding in order to provide insight into why some flood protection and response polices might succeed in one area but fail in another. Since natural flood mechanisms exist and socioeconomic conditions vary throughout the world, a mix of responses is necessary to effectively deal with the flood problem. The second section of this contribution describes the nature of some specific flood protection activities. In this manner, the need for effective flood management is demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater EncyclopediaSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207