Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key figure of the so-called "conceptual art", the North American artist Dan Graham began his artistic career in the mid-1960s quite by chance.Invited by friends, he became a partner of the John Daniels, a gallery in New York very active, but short-lived.Bankrupt, he was forced to return to his parents' home in New Jersey.During the train ride, Graham can saw the "new city".From this experience came Homes for America, notorious photographic essay on mass tract housing of North American suburbs, which is part of a first set of works for magazines.A while later, Graham joined the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, Halifax, starting a period in which your interest turns to video, performance and installation, interrupted by Public Space/Two Audiences, work done for the Venice Biennale in 1976 that impose the artist self-criticism.Despite its success, Graham recognizes that the installation was near of the concept of the "white cube".As out of the impasse, he adopts the idea of "city plan", going to propose urban interventions projects, starting in the early 80s their pavilions.Considering Graham's work, broad and diverse in its mediums, the thesis is a monograph that aims to carry out an analytical study of the practice of the artist, defined, in our view, in terms of a critical-conceptualist model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".