Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inhalt: Despoina ARIANTZI, Terminologische und sozialhistorische Untersuchungen zur Adoleszenz in Byzanz (6.–11. Jahrhundert). Teil I. Theorien, Konzepte, narrative Quellen Aude COHEN-SKALLI, Les Excerpta Constantiniana: une συλλογή conçue d’après un modèle juridique? Andrea Massimo CUOMO, Notizie sulla tradizione manoscritta della Diegesis di Ioannes Cananus Carolina CUPANE, Una passeggiata nei boschi narrativi. Lo statuto della finzione nel “Medioevo romanzo e Orientale”. In margine a un contributo recente Christian GASTGEBER, Schreiben der byzantinischen Kaiserkanzlei in der Kreuzzugsge-schichte des Wilhelm von Tyrus. Zur Authentizitätsfrage Erika GIELEN, The Synopsis of Joseph Racendytes: like a two-faced Egyptian Hermes? Andreas GKOUTZIOUKOSTAS, The judges of the Macedonia theme (9th–12th c.) Dominik HEHER, Der Tod am Pfahl Dirk KRAUSMÜLLER – Olga GRINCHENKO, The Tenth-Century Stoudios-Typikon and its Impact on Eleventh- and Twelfth-Century Byzantine Monasticism Krystina KUBINA, Manuel Philes and the Asan Family. Two inedited poems and their context in Philes’ œuvre (including editio princeps) Péter PROHÁSZKA, „Was in der Tasche blieb …“ Bemerkungen zum byzantinischen Münz-verkehr im ersten Viertel des 10. Jahrhunderts im Karpatenbecken Grigori SIMEONOV, Obst und Süßspeisen in den Ptochoprodromika Rudolf STEFEC, Zu Handschriften aus dem Umkreis des Michael Apostoles in Beständen der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.155 | 0.059 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".