MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238562765 · doi:10.5753/sbcas.2020.11531

Aplicativo Pallium: Interpretando dados para o auxílio na tomada de decisões paliativas

2020· article· pt· W4238562765 on OpenAlexaff
R T M Santos, Ilana Concilio

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative and Oncologic Care
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePhilosophyPsychologyNursingMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pallium é um projeto que nasceu de um desafio com a temática de inovação social atrelada ao seu desenvolvimento. O produto em questão consiste em um aplicativo móvel para iOS que analisa e interpreta dados com o intuito de auxiliar a tomada de decisão de uma equipe de cuidados paliativos, fornecendo dados básicos, porém necessários, para o funcionamento mais eficiente em qualquer hospital informatizado. Os pilares da concepção do aplicativo são a melhora da qualidade de vida dos pacientes, melhora do fluxo de trabalho das equipes de cuidados paliativos e uma melhor gestão de recursos das instituições hospitalares.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPalliative and Oncologic CareFrench-language works237,207