MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238566574 · doi:10.1049/el.2013.4010

editorial

2013· editorial· es· W4238566574 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociate editorLibrary scienceIBMWhite (mutation)Editorial boardManagementClassicsArt historyHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are delighted to introduce you to the first issue of the 50th Volume of Electronics Letters. To celebrate the journal entering its 50th year of publication, we have created this special section to look back over the last five decades. Chris Toumazou Ian White On page 3 we hear from former Editors Professor Peter Clarricoats and Sir Eric Ash. Launched in 1965, Electronics Letters was the brain child of Professor Clarricoats who, with the IET (or the IEE – Institution of Electrical Engineers – as it was then), pioneered a rapid publication model for the latest electronics research. Professor Clarricoats became the first Editor and remained at the helm for an immensely successful 40 years alongside Sir Eric who joined him as co-Editor a year later. We were both honoured to be asked to be a part of one of the most significant and highly respected journals coming out of the UK and to support the work of Professor Clarricoats and Sir Eric for several years as Honarary Editors before ourselves becoming co-Editors-in-Chief in 2006. Professor Clarricoats still remains in touch and assists with Electronics Letters as Founding Editor. On page 4 we are also delighted to present a feature article from Professor Lord (Alec) Broers, former IBM researcher, Professor and later Vice Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, Master of Churchill College, President of the UK Royal Academy of Engineering and Chairman of the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Lords. During his PhD in 1965, Lord Broers rebuilt a scanning electron microscope to write patterns and created the first nanostructures in gold, tungsten and silicon, thereby laying the foundations for the extreme miniaturisation of microelectronic circuits. In the feature article, Lord Broers recalls this time and the excitement around the possibilities of the transistor in the 1960s, and he also looks ahead to the challenges and opportunities facing electronic engineers today. We also present five papers published in Electronics Letters, one from each decade of publication. These papers represent just some of the topics covered in the journal and include the first announcement of the translinear circuit in 1975 by Barrie Gilbert, and one of the most highly cited papers in Electronics Letters: the first announcement in 1999 of a simplified form of the Bell-Laboratories Layered Space-Time technique-V-BLAST – which went on to be one of the most widely examined techniques in wireless communications research to date. Electronics Letters was set up as an international journal right from the start and, although English was the preferred language, submissions were also accepted in Russian, French, German and Italian for several years. 65% of the Letters published in the first issue were from British organisations but as the journal became more established, the number of Letters received and published from other countries grew rapidly. This was further accelerated when, in 1993, Electronics Letters became the first established peer-reviewed journal to be published in parallel online in a form that included full-text and graphics. Now it is a truly recognisable international name with papers received from over 70 different countries each year. Since 1965, over 115,000 papers have been submitted to Electronics Letters, and over 43,000 of these have been published. The topics covered by the journal have evolved with the changes in the field as is evident in the article by Clarricoats and Ash. New categories of research have also appeared in which the application of electrical engineering has benefitted some of the global challenges such as health, energy conversion and sustainability. Electronics Letters has demonstrated that it is well positioned not only to continue to support the rapid communication of many of the core electronic engineering topics upon which it was built, but also to expand and to diversify as new interdisciplinary technologies and directions emerge. Of course there are many people that have contributed to the success of Electronics Letters over the last five decades. The Editorial team at the IET has worked tirelessly to provide the best possible service to authors and readers. Many tens of thousands of reviewers have given their valuable time to assess and report back on the submissions to ensure that the quality is upheld. And, of course, the authors that, over the years, have expanded the journal with their latest advances in a huge range of ever-evolving and fascinating research topics. We are proud to be co-Editors-in-Chief of Electronics Letters as it enters its 50th year of publication. The journal continues to build on the solid roots that it was given in its early years, and more recent features such as e-first publication and open access options allow the research published in Electronics Letters to become even more discoverable, even faster. We hope that we will be able to maintain the great respect and reputation that many have worked hard to establish over the last fifty years and that Electronics Letters will continue to be a world leader in rapid, quality publication for many more years to come.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it