MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4238566574 · doi:10.1049/el.2013.4010

editorial

2013· editorial· es· W4238566574 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueElectronics Letters · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languees
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueComputational Physics and Python Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAssociate editorLibrary scienceIBMWhite (mutation)Editorial boardManagementClassicsArt historyHistoryComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We are delighted to introduce you to the first issue of the 50th Volume of Electronics Letters. To celebrate the journal entering its 50th year of publication, we have created this special section to look back over the last five decades. Chris Toumazou Ian White On page 3 we hear from former Editors Professor Peter Clarricoats and Sir Eric Ash. Launched in 1965, Electronics Letters was the brain child of Professor Clarricoats who, with the IET (or the IEE – Institution of Electrical Engineers – as it was then), pioneered a rapid publication model for the latest electronics research. Professor Clarricoats became the first Editor and remained at the helm for an immensely successful 40 years alongside Sir Eric who joined him as co-Editor a year later. We were both honoured to be asked to be a part of one of the most significant and highly respected journals coming out of the UK and to support the work of Professor Clarricoats and Sir Eric for several years as Honarary Editors before ourselves becoming co-Editors-in-Chief in 2006. Professor Clarricoats still remains in touch and assists with Electronics Letters as Founding Editor. On page 4 we are also delighted to present a feature article from Professor Lord (Alec) Broers, former IBM researcher, Professor and later Vice Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, Master of Churchill College, President of the UK Royal Academy of Engineering and Chairman of the Science and Technology Committee of the House of Lords. During his PhD in 1965, Lord Broers rebuilt a scanning electron microscope to write patterns and created the first nanostructures in gold, tungsten and silicon, thereby laying the foundations for the extreme miniaturisation of microelectronic circuits. In the feature article, Lord Broers recalls this time and the excitement around the possibilities of the transistor in the 1960s, and he also looks ahead to the challenges and opportunities facing electronic engineers today. We also present five papers published in Electronics Letters, one from each decade of publication. These papers represent just some of the topics covered in the journal and include the first announcement of the translinear circuit in 1975 by Barrie Gilbert, and one of the most highly cited papers in Electronics Letters: the first announcement in 1999 of a simplified form of the Bell-Laboratories Layered Space-Time technique-V-BLAST – which went on to be one of the most widely examined techniques in wireless communications research to date. Electronics Letters was set up as an international journal right from the start and, although English was the preferred language, submissions were also accepted in Russian, French, German and Italian for several years. 65% of the Letters published in the first issue were from British organisations but as the journal became more established, the number of Letters received and published from other countries grew rapidly. This was further accelerated when, in 1993, Electronics Letters became the first established peer-reviewed journal to be published in parallel online in a form that included full-text and graphics. Now it is a truly recognisable international name with papers received from over 70 different countries each year. Since 1965, over 115,000 papers have been submitted to Electronics Letters, and over 43,000 of these have been published. The topics covered by the journal have evolved with the changes in the field as is evident in the article by Clarricoats and Ash. New categories of research have also appeared in which the application of electrical engineering has benefitted some of the global challenges such as health, energy conversion and sustainability. Electronics Letters has demonstrated that it is well positioned not only to continue to support the rapid communication of many of the core electronic engineering topics upon which it was built, but also to expand and to diversify as new interdisciplinary technologies and directions emerge. Of course there are many people that have contributed to the success of Electronics Letters over the last five decades. The Editorial team at the IET has worked tirelessly to provide the best possible service to authors and readers. Many tens of thousands of reviewers have given their valuable time to assess and report back on the submissions to ensure that the quality is upheld. And, of course, the authors that, over the years, have expanded the journal with their latest advances in a huge range of ever-evolving and fascinating research topics. We are proud to be co-Editors-in-Chief of Electronics Letters as it enters its 50th year of publication. The journal continues to build on the solid roots that it was given in its early years, and more recent features such as e-first publication and open access options allow the research published in Electronics Letters to become even more discoverable, even faster. We hope that we will be able to maintain the great respect and reputation that many have worked hard to establish over the last fifty years and that Electronics Letters will continue to be a world leader in rapid, quality publication for many more years to come.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,093
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle