MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238572909 · doi:10.3138/flor.28.001

Introduction

2011· article· en· W4238572909 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jacqueline Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourHistoryClassicsMedieval studiesArt historyArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This collection of essays in honour of Margaret Wade Labarge (18 July 1916 - 31 August 2009) marks the passing of a remarkable scholar, but it also stands as a sentinel to the passing of a generation of noteworthy Canadian medievalists. Dr. Labarge (yes, it was honorary and a title she tended not to use, but she received three and they were certainly well merited) was part of that remarkable efflorescence of Medieval Studies that distinguished the Canadian academy in the 1970s and 1980s. The list of names reads as a Who’s Who of medievalists: Bertie Wilkinson, Michael Sheehan, Ambrose Raftis, Leonard Boyle, John Leyerle among many others. There with them, but not really part of their circle, was Margaret Wade Labarge, a married woman, without an academic appointment, a resident of Ottawa rather than Toronto. Yet she fits with them nonetheless as a leader and a leading light for Canadian Medieval Studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorilegiumSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207