MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4238620175 · doi:10.1177/229255030201000501

Clinical-pathological review of 14 cases of merkel cell carcinoma

2002· article· en· W4238620175 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Adel Quttainah, Samih Salama

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPolyomavirus and related diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMerkel cell carcinomaStage (stratigraphy)Radiation therapyTrunkSurgeryDiseaseLymph nodeIncidence (geometry)Merkel cellPathologicalCarcinomaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, primary, cutaneous, neuroendocrine skin tumour that occurs commonly in the head, neck or extremities of elderly white people. Fourteen cases of MCC in the Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre between 1992 and 2000 have been reviewed. Seven cases required a panel of immunohistochemical markers and two cases required electron microscopy for confirmation. Seven men and seven women were treated, and ranged from 67 to 96 years of age (mean 77.7 years). The primary tumour was located in the head and neck in seven patients (50%), in the extremities in four patients (29%) and on the trunk in two patients (14%). One patient had an unknown primary tumour location. Ten patients had stage Ia disease at presentation, three had stage Ib disease, and one presented with stage II disease. Primary treatment consisted of wide local excision in nine patients, wide local excision and radiotherapy in four patients and radiotherapy only in one patient. Seven patients had recurrence, five were disease free up to their most recent follow-up, one died of unrelated causes, and one was lost to follow-up after primary treatment. Of the seven patients with recurrence, two had local recurrence, two had lymph node recurrence and three developed metastases. Disease-free intervals were 69% and 50% for six-month and one-year follow-up, respectively. No difference in outcome was observed between stage Ia and Ib disease. The patient with stage II disease at presentation developed metastases. Longer duration of disease before presentation had a higher incidence of recurrence with distant metastases. Extremity lesions had the best prognosis associated with disease-free interval. Early management with excision and radiotherapy improved the disease-free interval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plastic SurgerySame topicPolyomavirus and related diseasesFrench-language works237,207